Perfil: People Who Find Wisdom In Inspirational Quotes Have Lower Intelligence

<p class="mol-para-with-font"><font style="font-size:1.2em">Most people know someone who persistently posts profound-sounding but ultimately meaningless statements or quotes on their page and Twitter feed.</font></p><p class="mol-para-with-font"><font style="font-size:1.2em">Now there is finally some vindication for those of us who fail to see the wisdom hidden within these collections of New-Age buzzwords.</font></p><img src="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/P6OMBuYONLU/hq720.jpg" width="450" style="max-width:450px;max-width:420px;float:right;padding:10px 0px 10px 10px;border:0px;"><p class="mol-para-with-font"><font style="font-size:1.2em">A new study has found that people who are more receptive to these so-called inspirational statements tend to also have lower levels of intelligence.</font></p><div class="mol-embed"><blockquote class</blockquote> <script async="" website charset="utf-8"></script> </div><p class="mol-para-with-font imageCaption mol-style-caption"><font style="font-size:1.2em">Psychologists have found that people who use New-Age inspirational statements - known as psuedo-profound bulls**t - tend to have lower cognitive scores. They used quotes taken from the Twitter feed (similar to the one above) of spiritual guru Deepak Chopra in the study </font></p><p class="mol-para-with-font"><font style="font-size:1.2em">They are also more prone to believing in the paranormal, hold religious beliefs and are taken in by conspiracy theories.</font></p><p class="mol-para-with-font"><font style="font-size:1.2em">In a study titled 'On the reception and detection of pseudo-profound bulls***t', psychologists examined whether some people are more receptive to these statements than others.</font></p><div><div data-track-module="am-related_carousel^related_carousel" data-track-selector=".rotator-panels a:not([class*=external])" data-dm-rotator-rotate="false" data-track-pos="static" data-preferred-shared-network-enabled="" data-dm-rotator-auto-init="" id="p-20" class="related-carousel with-fb-or-tw sciencetech" data-dm-rotator-active-class="active" data-dm-rotator-page-count="2.0" data-dm-social-article-auto-init="" data-dm-rotator-page-size="1"> <div class="rotator bdrcc"> <div class="rotator-title"> <h2>RELATED ARTICLES</h2> <ul class="rotator-pages link-xocc"> <li class="rotator-prev"></li> <li></li> <li></li> <li class="rotator-next"></li> </ul> </div> <ul class="rotator-panels link-bogr1 linkro-ccox"> <li> </li> <li> </li> </ul> </div> <p> </p><p> </p>
<p> </p><p> </p>
<p> </p><p> </p>
<u><b> <div class="fb"></b></u><p> </p><p> </p>
<h2>Share this article</h2><p> </p><p> </p>
<div class="share"><span class="wai">Share</span></div><p> </p><p> </p>
<div class="count"><span>11k</span> shares</div><p> </p><p> </p>
</div><p> </p><p> </p>
<p> </p><p> </p>
</div> </div><p class="mol-para-with-font"><font style="font-size:1.2em">During four experiments involving 845 volunteers, the researchers asked the participants to evaluate a series of statements to indicate how <a href="https://www.dictionary.com/browse/profound" rel="dofollow">profound</a> they thought they were or if they agreed with them.</font></p><p class="mol-para-with-font"><font style="font-size:1.2em">They used phrases such as 'attention and intention are the mechanics of Manifestation' and 'imagination is inside exponential space time events'.</font></p><div class="mol-embed"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet" align="center"><p lan</blockquote> <script async="" website charset="utf-8"></script> </div><div class="mol-html"> <div><blockquote class="instagram-media" data-instgrm-captioned="" data-instgrm-version="6" style=" background:#FFF; border:0; border-radius:3px; box-shadow:0 0 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.5),0 1px 10px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.15); margin: 1px; max-width:658px; padding:0; width:99.375%; width:-webkit-calc(100% - 2px); width:calc(100% - 2px);"><div style="padding:8px;"> <div style=" background:#F8F8F8; line-height:0; margin-top:40px; padding:50.0% 0; text-align:center; width:100%;"> </div></div> <p style=" margin:8px 0 0 0; padding:0 4px;"> </p> <p style=" color:#c9c8cd; font-family:Arial,sans-serif; font-size:14px; line-height:17px; margin-bottom:0; margin-top:8px; overflow:hidden; padding:8px 0 7px; text-align:center; text-overflow:ellipsis; white-space:nowrap;">A photo posted by Daily Dose Of Champions™ (@daily.dose) on <time style=" font-family:Arial,sans-serif; font-size:14px; line-height:17px;" datetime="2015-12-03T05:02:30+00:00">Dec 2, 2015 at 9:02pm PST</time></p></div></blockquote> <script async="" defer="" src="//platform.instagram.com/en_US/embeds.js"></script></div> </div><p class="mol-para-with-font"><font style="font-size:1.2em">In many of the tests, <a href="https://worldgigants.ru/" rel="dofollow">аккорды для гитары для начинающих</a> quotes were posted on Twitter by author and New Age guru Deepak Chopra.</font></p><p class="mol-para-with-font"><font style="font-size:1.2em">He is well known for quotes such as 'nature is a self-regulating ecosystem of awareness' and 'in the midst of movement and chaos, keep stillness inside of you'.</font></p><div class="art-ins mol-factbox floatRHS sciencetech" website <h3 class="wocc"> <span style="font-weight: bold;">PROFOUND OR NOT? </span> </h3> <div class="ins cleared xolcc bdrcc"> <p class="mol-para-with-font"><font style="font-size:1.2em;">These are just some of the statements used in the study by the researchers:</font></p><ul class="mol-bullets-with-font"><li class=""><font style="font-size: 1.2em;">Hidden meaning transforms unparalleled abstract beauty </font></li><li class=""><font style="font-size: 1.2em;">Imagination is inside exponential space time events </font></li><li class=""><font style="font-size: 1.2em;">A river cuts through a rock, not because of its power but its persistence </font></li><li class=""><font style="font-size: 1.2em;">An anxious person is a prisoner to their anxiety</font></li><li class=""><font style="font-size: 1.2em;">A wet person does not fear the rain </font></li></ul> </div><div data-swipe-article="false"><!- - ad: website - -><div class="adHolder mpu molads_mpu_factbox watermark" id="mpu_factbox_1" style="width:300px;height:250px;"><script>adverts.addToArray("pos":"mpu_factbox")</script><span class="mol-ads-label-container"><span class="mol-ads-label">Advertisement</span></span></div><p> </p><p> </p>
</div> </div><p class="mol-para-with-font"><font style="font-size:1.2em">These were mixed with statements that deliberately blended together buzzwords into meaningless sentences and mundane statements that could also be considered profound such as 'most people enjoy some sort of music'.</font></p><p class="mol-para-with-font"><font style="font-size:1.2em">In a follow-up test, the researchers also asked the participants to perform a series of cognitive tests. </font></p><p class="mol-para-with-font"><font style="font-size:1.2em">In one they asked them if they agreed with a series of statements about religion, the paranormal or conspiracy theories.</font></p><p class="mol-para-with-font"><font style="font-size:1.2em">Writing in the journal, , Gordon Pennycook, a cognitive psychologist at the University of Waterloo, in Ontario, who led the research, said: 'Although bulls**t is common in everyday life and has attracted attention from philosophers, its reception - critical or ingenuous - has not, to our knowledge, been subject to empirical investigation.</font></p><p class="mol-para-with-font"><font style="font-size:1.2em">'We focus on pseudo-profound bulls**t, which consists of seemingly impressive assertions that are presented as true and meaningful but are actually vacuous.</font></p><div class="mol-html"> <div><blockquote class="instagram-media" data-instgrm-captioned="" data-instgrm-version="6" style=" background:#FFF; border:0; border-radius:3px; box-shadow:0 0 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.5),0 1px 10px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.15); margin: 1px; max-width:658px; padding:0; width:99.375%; width:-webkit-calc(100% - 2px); width:calc(100% - 2px);"><div style="padding:8px;"> <div style=" background:#F8F8F8; line-height:0; margin-top:40px; padding:50.0% 0; text-align:center; width:100%;"> </div></div> <p style=" margin:8px 0 0 0; padding:0 4px;"> </p> <p style=" color:#c9c8cd; font-family:Arial,sans-serif; font-size:14px; line-height:17px; margin-bottom:0; margin-top:8px; overflow:hidden; padding:8px 0 7px; text-align:center; text-overflow:ellipsis; white-space:nowrap;">A photo posted by Feliz K. (@felizkren) on <time style=" font-family:Arial,sans-serif; font-size:14px; line-height:17px;" datetime="2015-12-03T15:36:09+00:00">Dec 3, 2015 at 7:36am PST</time></p></div></blockquote> <script async="" defer="" src="//platform.instagram.com/en_US/embeds.js"></script></div> </div><p class="mol-para-with-font"><font style="font-size:1.2em"></font></p><div class="mol-html"> <div><blockquote class="instagram-media" data-instgrm-captioned="" data-instgrm-version="6" style=" background:#FFF; border:0; border-radius:3px; box-shadow:0 0 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.5),0 1px 10px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.15); margin: 1px; max-width:658px; padding:0; width:99.375%; width:-webkit-calc(100% - 2px); width:calc(100% - 2px);"><div style="padding:8px;"> <div style=" background:#F8F8F8; line-height:0; margin-top:40px; padding:50.0% 0; text-align:center; width:100%;"> </div></div> <p style=" margin:8px 0 0 0; padding:0 4px;"> </p> <p style=" color:#c9c8cd; font-family:Arial,sans-serif; font-size:14px; line-height:17px; margin-bottom:0; margin-top:8px; overflow:hidden; padding:8px 0 7px; text-align:center; text-overflow:ellipsis; white-space:nowrap;">A photo posted by ⒷⒺⓉⓉⒺⓇ ⒻⓄⓃⓉⓈ (@betterfonts) on <time style=" font-family:Arial,sans-serif; font-size:14px; line-height:17px;" datetime="2015-10-14T12:03:22+00:00">Oct 14, 2015 at 5:03am PDT</time></p></div></blockquote> <script async="" defer="" src="//platform.instagram.com/en_US/embeds.js"></script></div> </div><p class="mol-para-with-font"><font style="font-size:1.2em">'Our results support the idea that some people are more receptive to this type of bulls**t and that detecting it is not merely a matter of indiscriminate skepticism but rather a discernment of deceptive vagueness in otherwise impressive sounding claims. </font></p><p class="mol-para-with-font"><font style="font-size:1.2em">'Those more receptive to bulls**t are less reflective, lower in cognitive ability - numeracy, verbal and fluid intelligence), are more prone to ontological confusions and conspiratorial ideation, are more likely to hold religious and paranormal beliefs, and are more likely to endorse complementary and alternative medicine.'</font></p><p class="mol-para-with-font"><font style="font-size:1.2em">Perhaps unusually for an academic paper, it is littered with swearwords - specifically one swearword, bulls**t.</font></p><div class="mol-html"> <div><blockquote class="instagram-media" data-instgrm-captioned="" data-instgrm-version="6" style=" background:#FFF; border:0; border-radius:3px; box-shadow:0 0 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.5),0 1px 10px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.15); margin: 1px; max-width:658px; padding:0; width:99.375%; width:-webkit-calc(100% - 2px); width:calc(100% - 2px);"><div style="padding:8px;"> <div style=" background:#F8F8F8; line-height:0; margin-top:40px; padding:50.0% 0; text-align:center; width:100%;"> </div></div> <p style=" margin:8px 0 0 0; padding:0 4px;"> </p> <p style=" color:#c9c8cd; font-family:Arial,sans-serif; font-size:14px; line-height:17px; margin-bottom:0; margin-top:8px; overflow:hidden; padding:8px 0 7px; text-align:center; text-overflow:ellipsis; white-space:nowrap;">A photo posted by ⒷⒺⓉⓉⒺⓇ ⒻⓄⓃⓉⓈ (@betterfonts) on <time style=" font-family:Arial,sans-serif; font-size:14px; line-height:17px;" datetime="2015-12-03T12:59:45+00:00">Dec 3, 2015 at 4:59am PST</time></p></div></blockquote> <script async="" defer="" src="//platform.instagram.com/en_US/embeds.js"></script></div> </div><p class="mol-para-with-font"><font style="font-size:1.2em">The word appears 200 times throughout the paper, but despite this the researchers assured MailOnline it is a serious study. </font></p><p class="mol-para-with-font"><font style="font-size:1.2em">They particularly single out quotes published by Deepak Chopra, who has been criticised in the past for producing 'woo-woo nonsense'.</font></p><p class="mol-para-with-font"><font style="font-size:1.2em">His quotes have become so infamous that several websites have been set up to generate random quotes in his style by pulling words from his Twitter feed.</font></p><div class="mol-embed"><blockquote class="twitter</blockquote> <script async="" website charset="utf-8"></script> </div><p class="mol-para-with-font"><font style="font-size:1.2em">After the paper was published, British physicist Professor Brian Cox posted a link to it on Mr Chopra's Twitter feed, sparking an angry response from the spiritual author, peppered with more of his trademark quotes.</font></p><p class="mol-para-with-font"><font style="font-size:1.2em">Mr Chopra said: 'Brian good for you. No resistance, no anticipation, no <a href="http://dig.ccmixter.org/search?searchp=regrets%20-" rel="dofollow">regrets -</a> just this moment as it is is also my motto.'</font></p><p class="mol-para-with-font"><font style="font-size: 1.2em">He later added: 'S**t of any kind is profound. It is stardust and recycles as life. Of all people you should know.'</font></p><div class="moduleFull mol-video"><div><div itemprop="video" itemscope="itemscope" website content="Woman ranks Facebook friends as way of managing expectations" itemprop="name" /><meta content="PT02M00S" itemprop="duration" /><meta website itemprop="thumbnailUrl" /><meta website itemprop="contentURL" /><meta content="2015-10-29T15:03:29+0000" itemprop="uploadDate" /><meta content="576" itemprop="height" /><meta content="1024" itemprop="width" /><meta content="Mobinah Ahmad develops quiz to rank social media friends after becoming unhappy with large amount of 'friends'" itemprop="description" /><div class="item"> <div class="vjs-video-container vjs-fixed vjs-span-two-col sciencetech" id="v-3984380815946464730"> <video controls="" class="video-js vjs-default-skin" website ranks Facebook friends as way of managing website Ahmad develops quiz to rank social media friends after becoming unhappy with large amount of website preload="none"> <source website type="video/mp4"></source> </video> </div> </div> </div></div></div></div><p> </p><p> </p>
<!-- ad: website --><p> </p><p> </p>
<p> </p><p> </p>
<b> <div id="external-source-links" class="item"</b><p> </p><p> </p>
data-track-module="am-external-links^external-links"><p> </p><p> </p>
<span>Read more:</span><p> </p><p> </p>
<ul><p> </p><p> </p>
<li></li><p> </p><p> </p>
</ul><p> </p><p> </p>
</div><p> </p><p> </p>
<script type="text/javascript"><p> </p><p> </p>
DM.later('bundle', function()<p> </p><p> </p>
<b> DM.has('external-source-links', 'externalLinkTracker');</b><p> </p><p> </p>
);<p> </p><p> </p>
</script>